> Should we consider including this recommendation into the MANRS IXP requirements?

I guess they should, checking if the next hop is correct is not a hard task for the route server. But also I think IXPs should forced the IP address and the Mac be corrected (I don't have access to many internet exchanges, as far as I know internet exchanges only have port security.)

> the amount of times I get added to random as-sets and having to complain to them to *NEVER GET EVEN AN RESPONSE BACK* is annoying as hell.

Well, I have a way for the regional Internet address registry to address that, not by ASPA. Even If ASPA has been completed, and it will take a lot of time to deploy it in all networks. Let's talk about it in this weekend.

Best,

Brandon Zhi
HUIZE LTD
www.huize.asia | www.ixp.su | Twitter

This e-mail and any attachments or any reproduction of this e-mail in whatever manner are confidential and for the use of the addressee(s) only. HUIZE LTD can’t take any liability and guarantee of the text of the email message and virus.

On 2023年1月9日周一下午4:14 Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky@isoc.org> wrote:

Hi,

On 07/01/2023, 19:18, "Manrs-community" <manrs-community-bounces@elists.manrs.org> wrote:

> Are there any actual cases of such hijacking parties?

yes - this was why section 4.8 made it into rfc7948.

Should we consider including this recommendation into the MANRS IXP requirements?

Regards,

Andrei